Articles

Elizabeth Warren Apologizes To The Native American Community | Deadline | MSNBC


>>>NOW BEFORE I GO ANY FURTHER>>>NOW BEFORE I GO ANY FURTHER IN THIS, I WANT TO SAY THIS, IN THIS, I WANT TO SAY THIS, LIKE ANYONE WHO’S BEING HONEST LIKE ANYONE WHO’S BEING HONEST WITH THEMSELVES, I KNOW THAT I WITH THEMSELVES, I KNOW THAT I HAVE MADE MISTAKES. HAVE MADE MISTAKES. I AM SORRY FOR HARM I HAVE I AM SORRY FOR HARM I HAVE CAUSED. CAUSED. I HAVE LISTENED AND I HAVE I HAVE LISTENED AND I HAVE LEARNED A LOT. LEARNED A LOT. AND I’M GRATEFUL FOR THE MANY AND I’M GRATEFUL FOR THE MANY CONVERSATIONS THAT WE’VE HAD CONVERSATIONS THAT WE’VE HAD TOGETHER. TOGETHER. IT IS A GREAT HONOR TO BE ABLE IT IS A GREAT HONOR TO BE ABLE TO PARTNER WITH INDIAN COUNTRY, TO PARTNER WITH INDIAN COUNTRY, AND THAT’S WHAT I HAVE TRIED TO AND THAT’S WHAT I HAVE TRIED TO DO AS A SENATOR, AND THAT’S WHAT DO AS A SENATOR, AND THAT’S WHAT I PROMISE I WILL DO AS PRESIDENT I PROMISE I WILL DO AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. OF THE UNITED STATES. OF AMERICA. OF AMERICA.>>THAT WAS ELIZABETH WARREN>>THAT WAS ELIZABETH WARREN ATTEMPTING TO SEIZE CONTROL AND ATTEMPTING TO SEIZE CONTROL AND END THE CONTROVERSY OVER A END THE CONTROVERSY OVER A NARRATIVE THAT DOGGED HER NARRATIVE THAT DOGGED HER CAMPAIGN, DESERVEDLY OR CAMPAIGN, DESERVEDLY OR OTHERWISE. OTHERWISE. SHE STARTED HER FORUM WITH AN SHE STARTED HER FORUM WITH AN APOLOGY. APOLOGY. YOU MAY REMEMBER HER PAST YOU MAY REMEMBER HER PAST COMMENTS HAVE BEEN THE SUBJECT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN THE SUBJECT OF RIDICULE, ESPECIALLY FROM OF RIDICULE, ESPECIALLY FROM DONALD TRUMP, WHO REFERS TO THE DONALD TRUMP, WHO REFERS TO THE SENATOR AS POCAHONTAS. SENATOR AS POCAHONTAS. EVEN TRUMP IS QUESTIONING IF HE EVEN TRUMP IS QUESTIONING IF HE WENT THERE TOO SOON. WENT THERE TOO SOON.>>WELL, IT’S LIKE ELIZABETH>>WELL, IT’S LIKE ELIZABETH WARREN. WARREN. I DID THE POCAHONTAS THING. I DID THE POCAHONTAS THING. I HIT HER REALLY HARD. I HIT HER REALLY HARD. AND IT LOOKED LIKE SHE WAS DOWN AND IT LOOKED LIKE SHE WAS DOWN AND OUT. AND OUT. BUT THAT WAS TOO LONG AGO. BUT THAT WAS TOO LONG AGO. I SHOULD HAVE WAITED. I SHOULD HAVE WAITED. BUT DON’T WORRY, WE WILL REVIVE BUT DON’T WORRY, WE WILL REVIVE IT. IT. IT CAN BE — IT WILL BE REVIVED. IT CAN BE — IT WILL BE REVIVED. AND IT CAN BE REVIVED VERY AND IT CAN BE REVIVED VERY EASILY. EASILY. AND VERY QUICKLY. AND VERY QUICKLY.>>JAKE AND THE TABLE ARE BACK.>>JAKE AND THE TABLE ARE BACK. KARINE JUST STARTING WITH YOU KARINE JUST STARTING WITH YOU HERE PICKING UP. HERE PICKING UP. LET’S START WITH WARREN HERSELF LET’S START WITH WARREN HERSELF AND WHAT YOU DECIDED TO DO AND WHAT YOU DECIDED TO DO TODAY. TODAY. WE ALL REMEMBER BACK IN THE WE ALL REMEMBER BACK IN THE MID-OCTOBER ELECTION SEASON BACK MID-OCTOBER ELECTION SEASON BACK IN 2016 SHE TRIED THIS GAMBIT IN 2016 SHE TRIED THIS GAMBIT WITH A DNA TEST THAT DID NOT GO WITH A DNA TEST THAT DID NOT GO WELL. WELL. SHE WAS WIDELY CRITICIZED BY SHE WAS WIDELY CRITICIZED BY OTHER DEMOCRATS AS BEING A OTHER DEMOCRATS AS BEING A DISTRACTION IN THE MIDTERMS, DISTRACTION IN THE MIDTERMS, WHOLE METHODOLOGY SEEMS LIKE A WHOLE METHODOLOGY SEEMS LIKE A STUNT. STUNT. SHE GOT HAMMERED, AGAIN, FROM SHE GOT HAMMERED, AGAIN, FROM FRIENDLY FIRE. FRIENDLY FIRE. A LOT OF DEMOCRATS UNHAPPY. A LOT OF DEMOCRATS UNHAPPY. THEN SHE KIND OF LET IT SIT FOR THEN SHE KIND OF LET IT SIT FOR A WHILE AND NOW SHE’S COME BACK A WHILE AND NOW SHE’S COME BACK WITH THIS VERY DECLARATIVE WITH THIS VERY DECLARATIVE STATEMENT DOING SOMETHING DONALD STATEMENT DOING SOMETHING DONALD TRUMP NEVER DOES, SOMETHING JOE TRUMP NEVER DOES, SOMETHING JOE BIDEN ALMOST NEVER DOES, BIDEN ALMOST NEVER DOES, APOLOGIZE IF A FULL-THROATED, APOLOGIZE IF A FULL-THROATED, STRAIGHTFORWARD WAY. STRAIGHTFORWARD WAY. DO YOU THINK THIS WORKS FOR HER? DO YOU THINK THIS WORKS FOR HER? IS IT OVER NOW? IS IT OVER NOW?>>I WAS THINKING THE SAME>>I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING, GOOD TO SEE SOMEONE IN THING, GOOD TO SEE SOMEONE IN LEADERSHIP ACTUALLY APOLOGIZE. LEADERSHIP ACTUALLY APOLOGIZE. IT’S WONDERFUL TO HEAR. IT’S WONDERFUL TO HEAR. LOOK LOOK KUDOS FOR HER. KUDOS FOR HER. MISSTEP. MISSTEP. THAT IS THE KIND WAY OF SAYING THAT IS THE KIND WAY OF SAYING IT. IT. IT WAS A MISTAKE. IT WAS A MISTAKE. SHE LISTENED TO THE CLIP, SHE SHE LISTENED TO THE CLIP, SHE LEARNED, SHE LISTENED TO LEARNED, SHE LISTENED TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND TOOK AN INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND TOOK AN INTROSPECTIVE LOOK AND FIGURED INTROSPECTIVE LOOK AND FIGURED OUT, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT I DID OUT, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT I DID WRONG AND I THINK SHE’S TRYING WRONG AND I THINK SHE’S TRYING TO MOVE FORWARD IN THE RIGHT WAY TO MOVE FORWARD IN THE RIGHT WAY THIS TIME AROUND. THIS TIME AROUND. I THINK IT WILL BE BENEFICIAL. I THINK IT WILL BE BENEFICIAL. I THINK IT WILL HELP HER. I THINK IT WILL HELP HER. THE OTHER THING TOO I WANT TO THE OTHER THING TOO I WANT TO SAY ABOUT HER, SHE’S PROBABLY SAY ABOUT HER, SHE’S PROBABLY ONE OF THE ONLY POLITICAL ONE OF THE ONLY POLITICAL FIGURES OUT THERE THAT’S BEEN FIGURES OUT THERE THAT’S BEEN BATTLETESTED AND WON THE TEST BATTLETESTED AND WON THE TEST THUS FAR BY DONALD TRUMP. THUS FAR BY DONALD TRUMP. POCAHONTAS IS A RACIAL SLUR POCAHONTAS IS A RACIAL SLUR DONALD TRUMP AS WE KNOW USED DONALD TRUMP AS WE KNOW USED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. LOOK AT HER NOW. LOOK AT HER NOW. SHE’S RISING IN THE POLLS SHE’S RISING IN THE POLLS BECAUSE OF HER PLAN BECAUSE BECAUSE OF HER PLAN BECAUSE SHE’S RUNNING AN INCREDIBLY SHE’S RUNNING AN INCREDIBLY START CAMPAIGN. START CAMPAIGN. THAT IS SOMETHING NOBODY ELSE THAT IS SOMETHING NOBODY ELSE HAS, SHE’S SO FAR, SO FAR HAS HAS, SHE’S SO FAR, SO FAR HAS SURVIVED ONE OF THE AWFUL SURVIVED ONE OF THE AWFUL NICKNAMES BY DONALD TRUMP. NICKNAMES BY DONALD TRUMP.>>TO PIGGY BACK ON THAT, THAT>>TO PIGGY BACK ON THAT, THAT CAUGHT THE WHITE HOUSE’S CAUGHT THE WHITE HOUSE’S ATTENTION, TRUMP’S BLUSTER ATTENTION, TRUMP’S BLUSTER ASIDE, PEOPLE AROUND THERE ARE ASIDE, PEOPLE AROUND THERE ARE IMPRESSED. IMPRESSED. SHE TOOK A PUNCH AND GOT BACK UP SHE TOOK A PUNCH AND GOT BACK UP AND KEPT GOING. AND KEPT GOING. THE FACT YOU CAN HAVE A COMEBACK THE FACT YOU CAN HAVE A COMEBACK STORY, THAT’S OFTEN VERY STORY, THAT’S OFTEN VERY IMPORTANT DURING THESE IMPORTANT DURING THESE CAMPAIGNS. CAMPAIGNS. THEY RECOGNIZE THIS IS SOMEBODY THEY RECOGNIZE THIS IS SOMEBODY THAT PERHAPS IS MORE FORMIDABLE THAT PERHAPS IS MORE FORMIDABLE THAN THEY FIRST THOUGHT. THAN THEY FIRST THOUGHT. THEY ARE SEEING HER POLL THEY ARE SEEING HER POLL NUMBERS. NUMBERS. THEY KNOW THE ORGANIZATION IS THEY KNOW THE ORGANIZATION IS PRETTY GOOD. PRETTY GOOD. THERE ARE PLENTY PREPARING FOR THERE ARE PLENTY PREPARING FOR BIDEN AS THE EVENTUAL NOMINEE BIDEN AS THE EVENTUAL NOMINEE BUT THEY ARE NOW MUCH MORE BUT THEY ARE NOW MUCH MORE WILLING TO CONSIDER THE WILLING TO CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY THE GENERAL ELECTION POSSIBILITY THE GENERAL ELECTION MAY BE AGAINST ELIZABETH WARREN. MAY BE AGAINST ELIZABETH WARREN.>>YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE>>YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE PRESIDENT’S REMARKS. PRESIDENT’S REMARKS. THERE WAS ALMOST SORT OF A THERE WAS ALMOST SORT OF A GRUDGING RESPECT THERE. GRUDGING RESPECT THERE. WE’LL HAVE TO GO BACK AT IT WE’LL HAVE TO GO BACK AT IT AGAIN, I GUESS, AND TRY THIS. AGAIN, I GUESS, AND TRY THIS. IT’S NOT OVER. IT’S NOT OVER. HE MADE CLEAR HE’S NOT FINISHED HE MADE CLEAR HE’S NOT FINISHED WITH THIS LINE OF ATTACK BUT WITH THIS LINE OF ATTACK BUT ALSO IT DIDN’T WORK. ALSO IT DIDN’T WORK.>>I WANT TO ADD — I WILL COME>>I WANT TO ADD — I WILL COME BACK TO TRUMP IN A SECOND AND BACK TO TRUMP IN A SECOND AND ASK WHERE HE GOES FROM HERE BUT ASK WHERE HE GOES FROM HERE BUT STICKING WITH WARREN FOR ONE STICKING WITH WARREN FOR ONE MORE SECOND WITH JAKE, “THE NEW MORE SECOND WITH JAKE, “THE NEW YORK TIMES” POINTS OUT IN YORK TIMES” POINTS OUT IN ADDITION TO THIS APOLOGY, SHE ADDITION TO THIS APOLOGY, SHE ALSO HAS A PLAN WHICH ELIZABETH ALSO HAS A PLAN WHICH ELIZABETH WARREN’S TRADEMARK. WARREN’S TRADEMARK. SHE’S GOT A PLAN FOR THAT AND IN SHE’S GOT A PLAN FOR THAT AND IN THIS CASE WE HAVE A QUOTE FROM THIS CASE WE HAVE A QUOTE FROM “THE TIMES” SHE TALKS ABOUT “THE TIMES” SHE TALKS ABOUT FRIDAY MISS WARREN ROLLED OUT A FRIDAY MISS WARREN ROLLED OUT A SET OF PROPOSALS INTENDED TO SET OF PROPOSALS INTENDED TO HELP NATIVE AMERICANS TALK ABOUT HELP NATIVE AMERICANS TALK ABOUT TOPICS LIVE SOVEREIGNTY AND TOPICS LIVE SOVEREIGNTY AND INDIGENOUS WOMEN. INDIGENOUS WOMEN. AND SHE COVERED AREAS LIKE AND SHE COVERED AREAS LIKE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION AND HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE. CRIMINAL JUSTICE. SO THERE’S NO DOUBT ELIZABETH SO THERE’S NO DOUBT ELIZABETH WARREN ISP OR THE RISE. WARREN ISP OR THE RISE. THERE’S NO DOUBT THE STORY IN THERE’S NO DOUBT THE STORY IN SOME WAYS THE FIRST EIGHT MONTHS SOME WAYS THE FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF THIS RACE, SHE’S BEEN THE ONE OF THIS RACE, SHE’S BEEN THE ONE CANDIDATE WHO HAS HAD CONSISTENT CANDIDATE WHO HAS HAD CONSISTENT UPWARD TRAJECTORY SINCE THE RACE UPWARD TRAJECTORY SINCE THE RACE STARTED. STARTED. YOU’VE SEEN BERNIE SANDERS ON YOU’VE SEEN BERNIE SANDERS ON THE DOWNSLIDE THROUGHOUT OR JOE THE DOWNSLIDE THROUGHOUT OR JOE BIDEN KIND OF TEETERING, LOSING BIDEN KIND OF TEETERING, LOSING SUPPORT BUT REALLY WARREN HAS SUPPORT BUT REALLY WARREN HAS BEEN THE STORY OF A CANDIDATE BEEN THE STORY OF A CANDIDATE WITH FOCUSED ENERGY, STRENGTH, WITH FOCUSED ENERGY, STRENGTH, GOOD CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATIONS IN GOOD CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATIONS IN PLACES LIKE IOWA, NEW HAMPSHIRE. PLACES LIKE IOWA, NEW HAMPSHIRE. IS THIS COMBINATION THE 1-2 IS THIS COMBINATION THE 1-2 PUNCH OF A DECLARATIVE APOLOGY PUNCH OF A DECLARATIVE APOLOGY AT THIS POINT AND HER KIND OF AT THIS POINT AND HER KIND OF TRADEMARK POLICY PROPOSALS ON TRADEMARK POLICY PROPOSALS ON IT, IS THIS THE THING THAT IT, IS THIS THE THING THAT ALLOWS HER TO PUT THIS QUESTION ALLOWS HER TO PUT THIS QUESTION BEHIND HER? BEHIND HER? THIS IS A LONG QUESTION BUT I THIS IS A LONG QUESTION BUT I ASK ONE LAST THING ABOUT IT, ASK ONE LAST THING ABOUT IT, WHICH IS THIS CONTROVERSY IS WHICH IS THIS CONTROVERSY IS NEVER REALLY ABOUT NATIVE NEVER REALLY ABOUT NATIVE AMERICAN ANCESTRY. AMERICAN ANCESTRY. THIS CONTROVERSY HAS BEEN ABOUT THIS CONTROVERSY HAS BEEN ABOUT ESZABOUT ESZABOUT ELIZABETH WARREN’S AUTHENTICITY. ELIZABETH WARREN’S AUTHENTICITY. WAS SHE LYING BEFORE THIS THING WAS SHE LYING BEFORE THIS THING TO GET ADVANTAGES THAT WERE TO GET ADVANTAGES THAT WERE MEANT TO BE GIVEN TO PEOPLE OF MEANT TO BE GIVEN TO PEOPLE OF COLOR, NONWHITE, PEOPLE OF COLOR, NONWHITE, PEOPLE OF MINORITY? MINORITY? HAS SHE MOVED PAST ALL OF THAT? HAS SHE MOVED PAST ALL OF THAT? AGAIN DONALD TRUMP ASIDE IN THE AGAIN DONALD TRUMP ASIDE IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE OR IS THIS DEMOCRATIC RACE OR IS THIS SOMETHING THAT COULDING IN AT SOMETHING THAT COULDING IN AT HER AS SHE GETS FURTHER AND HER AS SHE GETS FURTHER AND FURTHER ELEVATION? FURTHER ELEVATION?>>SHE MIGHT HAVE MOVED PAST IT>>SHE MIGHT HAVE MOVED PAST IT IN THE PRIMARY BUT IF THERE WAS IN THE PRIMARY BUT IF THERE WAS A CONTROVERSY MORE TAYLORMADE A CONTROVERSY MORE TAYLORMADE FOR DONALD TRUMP, I DON’T KNOW FOR DONALD TRUMP, I DON’T KNOW WHAT IT WOULD BE. WHAT IT WOULD BE. THIS GETS TO THE HEART OF THIS GETS TO THE HEART OF ANYTHING DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID ANYTHING DONALD TRUMP HAS SAID ABOUT POLITICIANS AND ABOUT POLITICIANS AND WASHINGTON, THAT THEY’RE WASHINGTON, THAT THEY’RE PHONIES, THEY CREATE AND LIE TO PHONIES, THEY CREATE AND LIE TO GET ADVANTAGES AND GAIN THE GET ADVANTAGES AND GAIN THE SYSTEM THAT HAS TURNED AGAINST SYSTEM THAT HAS TURNED AGAINST THE EVERYMAN AND BEING THE EVERYMAN AND BEING MANIPULATED BY DISHONEST PEOPLE. MANIPULATED BY DISHONEST PEOPLE. THAT’S WHAT THE PRESIDENT IS — THAT’S WHAT THE PRESIDENT IS — PRESUMABLY THAT’S WHAT HE SAID PRESUMABLY THAT’S WHAT HE SAID ALREADY AND THAT’S WHAT HE’S ALREADY AND THAT’S WHAT HE’S GOING TO CONTINUE TO SAY ABOUT GOING TO CONTINUE TO SAY ABOUT ELIZABETH WARREN. ELIZABETH WARREN. I THINK IN A GENERAL ELECTION TO I THINK IN A GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, AND THIS BE HONEST WITH YOU, AND THIS COULD BE JUST ME BEING NAIVE OR COULD BE JUST ME BEING NAIVE OR PERHAPS A BIT JADED, I THINK IN PERHAPS A BIT JADED, I THINK IN A GENERAL ELECTION PEOPLE GLOSS A GENERAL ELECTION PEOPLE GLOSS OVER SOME OF THESE POLICY OVER SOME OF THESE POLICY PROPOSALS. PROPOSALS. I KNOW I’M GOING TO GET HIT FOR I KNOW I’M GOING TO GET HIT FOR SAYING THAT BUT THEY DO. SAYING THAT BUT THEY DO. DONALD TRUMP SPEAKS IN PLANE DONALD TRUMP SPEAKS IN PLANE ENGLISH, IN PLAIN TERMS AND I ENGLISH, IN PLAIN TERMS AND I THINK HE HAS AN ADVANTAGE IN THINK HE HAS AN ADVANTAGE IN THAT SENSE. THAT SENSE. I THINK IN A GENERAL ELECTION I THINK IN A GENERAL ELECTION PERHAPS THAT’S AN ADVANTAGE FOR PERHAPS THAT’S AN ADVANTAGE FOR DONALD TRUMP AND COMBINE THAT DONALD TRUMP AND COMBINE THAT WITH THIS ARGUMENT ABOUT WITH THIS ARGUMENT ABOUT AUTHENTICITY WITH ELIZABETH AUTHENTICITY WITH ELIZABETH WARREN. WARREN. I JUST DON’T KNOW. I JUST DON’T KNOW. I’M JUST LAYING OUT SOME OF I’M JUST LAYING OUT SOME OF DYNAMICS HERE. DYNAMICS HERE. AGAIN, ONE OTHER THING NOBODY IS AGAIN, ONE OTHER THING NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT, NO DEMOCRATIC TALKING ABOUT, NO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS TALKING ABOUT, HOW CANDIDATE IS TALKING ABOUT, HOW THEY ARE GOING TO GET THESE THEY ARE GOING TO GET THESE PLANS THROUGH. PLANS THROUGH. THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT VERY THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT VERY AMBITIOUS PIECE OF LEGISLATION AMBITIOUS PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT BASICALLY STAND NO CHANCE THAT BASICALLY STAND NO CHANCE IN THE REALITY WE LIVE IN IN THE REALITY WE LIVE IN WASHINGTON. WASHINGTON. SO THOSE TWO THINGS I’M KEEPING SO THOSE TWO THINGS I’M KEEPING AN EYE ON. AN EYE ON.>>BEFORE WE COME BACK, WE KNOW>>BEFORE WE COME BACK, WE KNOW TO WIN THE NOMINATION YOU HAVE TO WIN THE NOMINATION YOU HAVE TO GET A LOT OF NONWHITE VOTES. TO GET A LOT OF NONWHITE VOTES. YOU HAVE TO DO WELL WITH YOU HAVE TO DO WELL WITH AFRICAN-AMERICAN NUMBERS AND AFRICAN-AMERICAN NUMBERS AND HISPANIC NUMBERS. HISPANIC NUMBERS. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS ABOUT ONE OF THE QUESTIONS ABOUT WARREN WAS, THIS QUESTION I JUST WARREN WAS, THIS QUESTION I JUST RAISED WITH JAKE, THIS RAISED WITH JAKE, THIS AUTHENTICITY QUESTION, WOULD AUTHENTICITY QUESTION, WOULD NONWHITE VOTERS BE AN ISSUE, IF NONWHITE VOTERS BE AN ISSUE, IF SHE WAS CLAIMING TO HAVE NATIVE SHE WAS CLAIMING TO HAVE NATIVE AMERICAN ANCESTRY, IF SHE USED AMERICAN ANCESTRY, IF SHE USED THAT TO GET AFFIRMATIVE ACTION THAT TO GET AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HER CAREER, WOULD THAT BE A IN HER CAREER, WOULD THAT BE A PROBLEM AS SHE TRIED TO MAKE PROBLEM AS SHE TRIED TO MAKE INROADS WITH OTHER NONWHITE INROADS WITH OTHER NONWHITE VOTERS? VOTERS? OTHER THAN JOE BIDEN, WE KNOW OTHER THAN JOE BIDEN, WE KNOW THERE’S NO ONE WITH A BIG CHUNK THERE’S NO ONE WITH A BIG CHUNK OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTE. OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTE. I ASK YOU IN THE DEMOCRATIC I ASK YOU IN THE DEMOCRATIC LANE, IS SHE HANDLING THIS WELL LANE, IS SHE HANDLING THIS WELL OR DOES SHE STILL HAVE A OR DOES SHE STILL HAVE A CHALLENGE HERE THAT DOG HER JUST CHALLENGE HERE THAT DOG HER JUST TO GET THE NOMINATION BEFORE SHE TO GET THE NOMINATION BEFORE SHE HAS TO GO DEAL WITH DONALD HAS TO GO DEAL WITH DONALD TRUMP? TRUMP?>>I THINK IN THE PRIMARY JAKE>>I THINK IN THE PRIMARY JAKE IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THERE WAS THE AUTHENTICITY THERE WAS THE AUTHENTICITY QUESTION, ABSOLUTELY. QUESTION, ABSOLUTELY. I THINK IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHENTIC I THINK IF YOU ARE NOT AUTHENTIC ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PRESENT YOURSELF TO BE, PEOPLE PRESENT YOURSELF TO BE, PEOPLE DON’T THINK THAT’S REAL, THEN, DON’T THINK THAT’S REAL, THEN, YEAH, YOU WILL HAVE PROBLEMS YEAH, YOU WILL HAVE PROBLEMS WITH THAT NONMINORITY VOTE IN WITH THAT NONMINORITY VOTE IN PARTICULAR — I’M SORRY, THAT PARTICULAR — I’M SORRY, THAT MINORITY VOTE THAT YOU’RE MINORITY VOTE THAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. TALKING ABOUT. BUT I ACTUALLY THINK OUTSIDE OF BUT I ACTUALLY THINK OUTSIDE OF THE DNA TESTS, ELIZABETH WARREN THE DNA TESTS, ELIZABETH WARREN HAS BEEN DOING A REALLY GOOD HAS BEEN DOING A REALLY GOOD JOB. JOB. SHE WAS ONE OF THE FIRST AND SHE WAS ONE OF THE FIRST AND ONLY REALLY I COULD ARGUE OF ONLY REALLY I COULD ARGUE OF WHITE CANDIDATES OUT THERE WHO WHITE CANDIDATES OUT THERE WHO WAS TALKING ABOUT HER PLAN IN WAS TALKING ABOUT HER PLAN IN PUTTING A RACIAL LENS AND PUTTING A RACIAL LENS AND PUTTING THAT MULTI CULTURE FEEL PUTTING THAT MULTI CULTURE FEEL THROUGH ALL OF HER PLANS. THROUGH ALL OF HER PLANS. THE I THINK THAT MATTERS. THE I THINK THAT MATTERS. PEOPLE SEE THAT IN THE BLACK PEOPLE SEE THAT IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY AND PEOPLE ARE REALLY COMMUNITY AND PEOPLE ARE REALLY CONNECTING TO THAT WITH HER WHEN CONNECTING TO THAT WITH HER WHEN THEY SEE HER OUT THERE, WHEN THEY SEE HER OUT THERE, WHEN SHE’S GOING EVERYWHERE. SHE’S GOING EVERYWHERE. EVEN IN RED STATES, SHE’S GOING EVEN IN RED STATES, SHE’S GOING TO DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES AND SHE TO DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES AND SHE TALKS ABOUT HER PLAN AND TALKS ABOUT HER PLAN AND UNAPOLOGETIC ABOUT IT. UNAPOLOGETIC ABOUT IT. IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT ONE IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT ONE COMMUNITY, IT’S ABOUT ALL OF THE COMMUNITY, IT’S ABOUT ALL OF THE COMMUNITIES. COMMUNITIES. I THINK SHE WAS ALREADY THERE I THINK SHE WAS ALREADY THERE BEFORE THIS BUT I THINK THIS BEFORE THIS BUT I THINK THIS WILL HELP HER HAVING A WILL HELP HER HAVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AROUND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND HAVING THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND HAVING THE EVENT THAT SHE’S HAVING TODAY. EVENT THAT SHE’S HAVING TODAY.>>JAKE, I KNOW YOU HAVE TO GO>>JAKE, I KNOW YOU HAVE TO GO AND I WANT TO COME BACK WITH ONE AND I WANT TO COME BACK WITH ONE LAST QUESTION AND IF I HAVE TIME LAST QUESTION AND IF I HAVE TIME HIT LA LEAR ON THIS. HIT LA LEAR ON THIS. I WANT TO GET BACK TO TRUMP. I WANT TO GET BACK TO TRUMP. THERE WAS A DAVE WEIGEL PIECE I THERE WAS A DAVE WEIGEL PIECE I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING THE THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING THE OTHER DAY ON POCAHONTAS. OTHER DAY ON POCAHONTAS. HE WRITES AFTER ABSORBING THREE HE WRITES AFTER ABSORBING THREE YEARS OF INSULTS FROM THE YEARS OF INSULTS FROM THE PRESIDENT, WARREN SETTLED INTO A PRESIDENT, WARREN SETTLED INTO A NEW POSITION. NEW POSITION. WE’RE NOT BEING ASKED ABOUT THE WE’RE NOT BEING ASKED ABOUT THE I SULT BECAUSE IT’S NOT MAKING I SULT BECAUSE IT’S NOT MAKING NEWS. NEWS. THE LAST MONTH PRESIDENT TRUMP THE LAST MONTH PRESIDENT TRUMP IMPLIED IT THREE TIMES AND THAT IMPLIED IT THREE TIMES AND THAT HAD MEDIA OUTLETS SCRAMBLING FOR HAD MEDIA OUTLETS SCRAMBLING FOR OUTLETS FROM ARE WARREN BUT MOST OUTLETS FROM ARE WARREN BUT MOST SIMPLY, THEY’RE NOT MAKING NEWS. SIMPLY, THEY’RE NOT MAKING NEWS. HE LIKES TO JUST THROW OUT HE LIKES TO JUST THROW OUT INSULTS THAT CAUSE REPORTERS TO INSULTS THAT CAUSE REPORTERS TO SCRAMBLE AND GO AND PUT THE CADE SCRAMBLE AND GO AND PUT THE CADE HE’S ATTACKING IN UNCOMFORTABLE HE’S ATTACKING IN UNCOMFORTABLE POSITIONS. POSITIONS. IS THERE A CHANCE TRUMP LOOKS AT IS THERE A CHANCE TRUMP LOOKS AT THIS AND HE SAID IN THE CLIP WE THIS AND HE SAID IN THE CLIP WE PLAYED, WE HAVE TO REVIVE IT, PLAYED, WE HAVE TO REVIVE IT, THAT HE BE JUST LOOKS AT THE WAY THAT HE BE JUST LOOKS AT THE WAY THE COVERAGE IS, WOOINGRKING AND THE COVERAGE IS, WOOINGRKING AND SAYS THIS IS NOT WORKING ANYMORE SAYS THIS IS NOT WORKING ANYMORE FOR ME AND HAS TO FIND ANOTHER FOR ME AND HAS TO FIND ANOTHER WAY TO ATTACK WAR INTO GET WAY TO ATTACK WAR INTO GET SOMETHING AGAINST HER? SOMETHING AGAINST HER?>>YES, THIS BROUGHT UP>>YES, THIS BROUGHT UP SOMETHING A REPUBLICAN BROUGHT SOMETHING A REPUBLICAN BROUGHT UP TO ME THE OTHER DAY, DOING UP TO ME THE OTHER DAY, DOING TOO MANY RALLIES AND SAYING TOO TOO MANY RALLIES AND SAYING TOO MUCH WORKS AGAINST THE FREZ’S MUCH WORKS AGAINST THE FREZ’S PRESIDENT’S FAVOR AND BECOMES PRESIDENT’S FAVOR AND BECOMES WHITE NOISE IN THE BACKGROUND OF WHITE NOISE IN THE BACKGROUND OF A LOUD CAMPAIGN. A LOUD CAMPAIGN. I THINK THE PRESIDENT WILL FOCUS I THINK THE PRESIDENT WILL FOCUS ON AUTHENTICITY. ON AUTHENTICITY. IF SHE’S PRESENTING HERSELF, AS IF SHE’S PRESENTING HERSELF, AS YOU GUYS SAID AT THE TABLE, IF YOU GUYS SAID AT THE TABLE, IF SHE PRESENTING HERSELF IN ONE SHE PRESENTING HERSELF IN ONE WAY THAT’S NOT REALITY, WHAT WAY THAT’S NOT REALITY, WHAT ELSE IS SHE SAYING THAT IS ELSE IS SHE SAYING THAT IS UNTRUE? UNTRUE? YOU SEE IT PIVOT TO CAN YOU YOU SEE IT PIVOT TO CAN YOU TRUST THIS PERSON? TRUST THIS PERSON? AND WITH OTHER LINES OF AING AND WITH OTHER LINES OF AING THAT, YOU CAN ENVISION HOW THIS THAT, YOU CAN ENVISION HOW THIS WOULD PLAY OUT ON A BROADER WOULD PLAY OUT ON A BROADER LEVEL. LEVEL. HE NEVER HAS JUST ONE INSULT OR HE NEVER HAS JUST ONE INSULT OR ONE CRITICISM AGAINST A ONE CRITICISM AGAINST A POLITICIAN. POLITICIAN. HE FINDS A LITANY OF THEM. HE FINDS A LITANY OF THEM.>>VERY QUICKLY, LEMIRE, WILL WE>>VERY QUICKLY, LEMIRE, WILL WE HEAR MORE POCAHONTAS FROM DONALD HEAR MORE POCAHONTAS FROM DONALD TRUMP? TRUMP? OR WILL HE MOVE ON TO SOMETHING OR WILL HE MOVE ON TO SOMETHING NEW? NEW?>>THE ANSWER IS YES AND YES.>>THE ANSWER IS YES AND YES. I AGREE WITH JAKE AND I ALSO I AGREE WITH JAKE AND I ALSO THINK IF WARREN ISN’T THERE, THINK IF WARREN ISN’T THERE, IT’S MORE BUY BINARY BOYCE, IT’S MORE BUY BINARY BOYCE, WARREN WILL GET ASKED ABOUT IT. WARREN WILL GET ASKED ABOUT IT. CAN’T GET AWAY FROM THAT. CAN’T GET AWAY FROM THAT. AND SECONDLY TRUMP FEELS LIKE AND SECONDLY TRUMP FEELS LIKE THIS ATTACK COULD APPEAL TO HIS

Comment here